Finally, there are six 32-bit memory interfaces, each one linked to a single 8Gb or 16Gb GDDR6 module - the latter is reserved for desktops at present, with the 8Gb modules used on laptops. The SMs also contain one second-gen RT core and four third-gen Tensor cores, each of which is up to twice the performance as the previous generation cores, and with sparsity the Tensor cores are potentially four times as fast as on Turing. (Note that the mobile RTX 3060 has all 30 SMs enabled, though it only comes with 6GB of memory, which is also clocked lower than on the desktop card.)Įach SM contains 64 dedicated FP32 CUDA cores, plus 64 more FP32+INT32 CUDA cores - only FP32 or INT32 can be used for each cycle. The full chip has 30 SMs while the 3060 disables two and ends up with 28 SMs, but everything else is left alone. At a high level, there are three GPCs (Graphics Processing Clusters), each with up to 10 SMs and 16 ROPs (the two blocks of eight blue rectangles each at the bottom of the GPC). This is the first desktop card to use Nvidia's GA106 processor. Power use remains similar, with a 170W TGP (Total Graphics Power), a decent step down from the RTX 3060 Ti's 220W TGP. It also doubles VRAM capacity (at least until the anticipated RTX 3060 6GB shows up, though perhaps maybe Nvidia will just leave that for the RTX 3050 line) and boasts improvements in the RT and Tensor cores, as well as the memory subsystem, all leading to better performance. Ampere gives you a lot more shader cores, which means potentially much higher computational performance, and a minor improvement in memory bandwidth for the 12GB card. The RTX 20 Super show how much things have changed for the -60 suffix cards between Turing and Ampere. The GTX 660 consistently delivers great frame rate increases over the GTX 560, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti and it really justifies an upgrade.Here's how things break down, comparing the RTX 3060 with its closest Ampere sibling and Turing predecessors. Fortunately, gaming performance was quite impressive. The GTX 660 has 2 GB RAM compared to the GTX 560 's 1 GB video memory. Spec for spec, this GTX 660 leapfrogs its direct predecessor, the GTX 560, by boasting 24.2 % more fps. After taking the time to fully test the Kepler graphics card inside the GTX 660, we can say without a doubt that it continues the trend. NVIDIA ’s x圆0 cards have always been defined by entry-level prices with performance that knocks on the door of mid-range graphics cards – especially when overclocked. The good news is, with the release of the GTX 660 Ti, the GTX 660 's price is getting more discount. On the other hand, the GTX 660 is closer to being reasonably affordable at a price tag of $ 229. The GTX 670 might be the mid-range flagship of the latest Kepler set of graphics cards, but their prices keep them out of the reach of most entry-level PC gamers. The overall score is determined based on the calculated weightings for the individual components. The higher the better for higher resolution textures and future The higher the better.Ĭurrent CPU Impact on performance with respect to the highest performing CPU used for benchmark at the The higher the better.ĤK performance at 2160p resolution. The lower the better.įull HD performance at 1080p resolution. The lower the better for longer life of the graphics card. Power Supply Wattage required for overall system. The newer the better technology and performance optimization and
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |